Anthony Sherman · Good GM

All NFL teams

Full-career context

These totals follow Anthony Sherman across every NFL team. Draft credit is separated below for each team that selected him.

Games played153

Games started35

Weighted career AV5

Pro Bowls1

AP1 All-Pro0

Career seasons10

Accountability by draft event

What each drafting team received

2011 · Round 5 · #136

ARI draft credit

GM Rod Graves

Team games28

Team starts11

On-team AV1

On-team PB / AP10 / 0

Terrible-2.19 contribution64th of 70 picks for this GM

Games: direct team-season record. Starts: direct team-season record.

Long-career hit

Anthony Sherman became a 10-season, 153-game NFL player after going #136. The retained-value model still ranks him 64th of 70 for Rod Graves because ARI only got 28 of those games.

His retained-value contribution score (opportunity plus quality plus recognition, with related outcomes collapsed inside each bucket) is -2.19. This is a per-pick accountability metric, separate from Rod Graves's leaderboard composite θ.

Full-career context prevents this from being labeled as a bad talent pick: the negative model score is about retained team value, not whether the draft identified an NFL-caliber player.

The walkthrough below shows which bucket carried the pick: playing time, value quality, or league honors.

Opportunity

Did he earn the field?

Games played

on drafting team · 153 full-career

Games started

on drafting team · 35 full-career

Snap-z

0.0

0 modeled seasons

Quality

Was that time valuable?

On-team AV

modeled; full weighted AV 5

AV / 1k snaps

—

snap-era only

AV-rate z

—

position-year adjusted quality

Recognition

Did the league notice?

Pro Bowls

1 full-career

AP1 All-Pro

0 AP1

all on drafting team · AP2 context 0

All-Decade

context only

Did this pick move Rod Graves's grade?

The first chart removes the time axis: every Rod Graves pick is sorted by retained contribution across opportunity, quality, and recognition. Anthony Sherman totals -2.19. The second chart breaks that same contribution into the seasons when the evidence arrived. Opportunity and quality can move separately, which keeps high-snap, low-AV profiles from looking cleaner than they are.

Aggregate contribution by player

Incremental contribution by season

Above expectationBelow expectationAnthony ShermanGM total -11.7Anthony Sherman by season -3.3

How much retained production did Anthony Sherman return vs. his slot?

Each mark below is one player's model value above slot. Light gray marks are slot-similar peers: RBs drafted within ±5 picks of Anthony Sherman since 2010 (16 players).The score is the retained production/value bucket from the pick-residual model: on-team AV plus AV-rate quality, adjusted for draft slot, position, and era. Opportunity snaps and league honors are excluded.

Anthony ShermanSlot-similar peers (16)

Cumulative value over time

Year-by-year running totals since draft. Left axis = games started. Right axis = honors (Pro Bowl / AP1 / AP2). Pre-2013 picks have no games-started line because that comes from per-game snap counts (not available for older players). Honors extend back to 1980.

Games started (cumulative) Pro Bowls AP1 All-Pro AP2 All-Pro

Full-career season history (10 scored seasons)

Year	Team	GP	GS	Snaps	Snap-z	AV	AV/snap
2011	ARI	15	7	—	—	1	—
2012	ARI	13	4	—	—	0	—
2013	KC	16	15	683	1.6	1	1.5
2014	KC	16	12	482	1.2	1	2.1
2015	KC	16	16	503	0.9	0	0.0
2016	KC	16	16	507	1.0	0	0.0
2017	KC	16	16	523	1.2	1	1.9
2018	KC	16	16	443	0.4	1	2.3
2019	KC	16	16	407	0.6	0	0.0
2020	KC	13	13	319	0.1	0	0.0

How to read this

The current model groups outcomes into three buckets: opportunity (games, starts, snap-z), quality (on-team AV, AV/snap quality when available), and recognition (Pro Bowl, AP1).
Season rows show full-career context across every team. The draft-credit cards above contain the team-specific totals used for GM accountability. Snap-z is position/year-normalized playing time; AV/snap is shown as AV per 1,000 snaps where snap evidence exists.
AP2, full-career AV, HOF, and All-Decade are displayed as context only. They are not active outcomes in the current θ model.
Pre-2013 playing-time rows may show "—" where weekly snap evidence is unavailable; AV/snap quality is snap-era only.