Average-0.30 contribution19th of 35 picks for this GM
Games: direct team-season record. Starts: direct team-season record.
Long-career hit
Nigel Bradham became a 9-season, 116-game NFL player after going #105. The retained-value model still ranks him 19th of 35 for Buddy Nix because BUF only got 57 of those games.
His retained-value contribution score (opportunity plus quality plus recognition, with related outcomes collapsed inside each bucket) is -0.30. This is a per-pick accountability metric, separate from Buddy Nix's leaderboard composite θ.
Full-career context prevents this from being labeled as a bad talent pick: the negative model score is about retained team value, not whether the draft identified an NFL-caliber player.
The walkthrough below shows which bucket carried the pick: playing time, value quality, or league honors.
Opportunity
Did he earn the field?
Games played
57
on drafting team · 116 full-career
Games started
38
on drafting team · 96 full-career
Snap-z
2.8
3 modeled seasons
Quality
Was that time valuable?
On-team AV
20
modeled; full weighted AV 44
AV / 1k snaps
6.8
2,344 snaps in rate base
AV-rate z
+0.1
position-year adjusted quality
Recognition
Did the league notice?
Pro Bowls
0
all on drafting team
AP1 All-Pro
0 AP1
all on drafting team · AP2 context 0
All-Decade
0
context only
Did this pick move Buddy Nix's grade?
The first chart removes the time axis: every Buddy Nix pick is sorted by retained contribution across opportunity, quality, and recognition. Nigel Bradham totals -0.30. The second chart breaks that same contribution into the seasons when the evidence arrived. Opportunity and quality can move separately, which keeps high-snap, low-AV profiles from looking cleaner than they are.
Aggregate contribution by player
Incremental contribution by season
Above expectationBelow expectationNigel BradhamGM total -11.2Nigel Bradham by season -0.6
How much retained production did Nigel Bradham return vs. his slot?
Each mark below is one player's model value above slot. Light gray marks are slot-similar peers: LBs drafted within ±5 picks of Nigel Bradham since 2010 (14 players).The score is the retained production/value bucket from the pick-residual model: on-team AV plus AV-rate quality, adjusted for draft slot, position, and era. Opportunity snaps and league honors are excluded.
Nigel BradhamSlot-similar peers (14)
Cumulative value over time
Year-by-year running totals since draft. Left axis = games started. Right axis = honors (Pro Bowl / AP1 / AP2). Pre-2013 picks have no games-started line because that comes from per-game snap counts (not available for older players). Honors extend back to 1980.
Games started (cumulative)Pro BowlsAP1 All-ProAP2 All-Pro
Full-career season history (9 scored seasons)
Year
Team
GP
GS
Snaps
Snap-z
AV
AV/snap
PB
AP1
AP2
2012
BUF
16
11
—
—
4
—
2013
BUF
16
14
586
0.3
2
3.4
2014
BUF
14
13
921
1.4
8
8.7
2015
BUF
11
11
837
1.1
6
7.2
2016
PHI
16
16
1,047
1.8
8
7.6
2017
PHI
15
15
981
1.7
9
9.2
2018
PHI
15
15
926
1.4
7
7.6
2019
PHI
12
11
728
0.8
7
9.6
2020
DEN
1
1
17
-1.3
0
0.0
How to read this
The current model groups outcomes into three buckets: opportunity (games, starts, snap-z), quality (on-team AV, AV/snap quality when available), and recognition (Pro Bowl, AP1).
Season rows show full-career context across every team. The draft-credit cards above contain the team-specific totals used for GM accountability. Snap-z is position/year-normalized playing time; AV/snap is shown as AV per 1,000 snaps where snap evidence exists.
AP2, full-career AV, HOF, and All-Decade are displayed as context only. They are not active outcomes in the current θ model.
Pre-2013 playing-time rows may show "—" where weekly snap evidence is unavailable; AV/snap quality is snap-era only.